RFD 096: Terminal Output Sanitization for Untrusted Content

• Status: Discussion
• Category: Design
• Authors: Jean Mertz git@jeanmertz.com
• Date: 2026-07-07

Summary

JP writes conversation content — echoed user messages, streamed LLM output, tool results — to the terminal without filtering control bytes, so content containing escape sequences is executed by the terminal instead of displayed. This RFD introduces render-time sanitization for untrusted content: benign styling sequences (colors, bold) pass through, terminal-state-changing sequences are neutralized, and stored data remains byte-for-byte verbatim.

Motivation

The triggering incident: a user pasted a raw tty log (captured with script) into an editor-composed reply. JP echoes editor-composed messages back to the terminal, and the log's escape sequences — cursor positioning, line erasure, color state — executed on the user's terminal and corrupted its display. Because the message is stored verbatim, every re-render (jp conversation print, --replay, scrolling back through history) replays the corruption.

The display glitch is the benign version of the problem. The same render pipeline prints LLM output and tool results, and those are untrusted by construction: a model — or a prompt-injected web page flowing through a tool result — can emit sequences that:

• move the cursor and rewrite earlier lines, e.g. to spoof a tool-approval prompt or alter text the user already read;
• erase or scroll content out of view to hide it;
• switch terminal modes (alternate screen, bracketed paste, mouse reporting), breaking JP's own prompts;
• write the clipboard (OSC 52) or retitle the window (OSC 0/2) on supporting terminals.

This is a known attack class for LLM CLIs; several comparable tools have shipped CVEs for exactly this.

Empirically, at least one supported provider passes functional ANSI escape sequences through verbatim: a raw ESC byte from the model stream reaches the client and executes if rendered to a terminal. JP cannot assume providers strip them.

The LLM stream is not even the most exposed path. Echoed user messages (the triggering incident) and tool results (fetched web pages, file contents, colored build output) carry real escape bytes without passing through a model at all.

There is also a narrower injection point: JP embeds the conversation title — LLM-generated text — into an OSC 2 window-title sequence. A title containing a BEL or ESC \ terminator ends the OSC early and injects whatever follows as raw terminal input.

If we do nothing, every render of hostile or accidental control bytes executes them, and the stored conversation makes the problem permanent.

Design

Trust model

Output falls into two classes, following the channel taxonomy of RFD 048:

Class	Examples	Policy
Chrome	Role headers, separators, status line, jp_md styling, prompt widgets	Trusted, unmodified
Content	Echoed user messages, LLM message/reasoning text, tool result text, titles	Sanitized at render

The boundary is authorship: bytes JP composes are chrome; bytes that originate in conversation data, model output, or tool output are content.

Sanitization policy

Sanitization is an allowlist over escape-sequence classes, not a blanket strip — JP's local tools legitimately use color in their output, and that must keep working.

Class	Action	Rationale
Printable text, \n, \t	Keep	Content.
SGR (CSI … m), except conceal (SGR 8)	Keep	Colors/bold are display-only; tools rely on them.
SGR conceal (CSI 8 m)	Drop	Hides text from the user.
All other CSI (cursor, erase, scroll, DEC modes)	Drop	Rewrites or hides what the user sees.
OSC (title, clipboard, hyperlinks)	Drop	Side effects beyond the character grid.
DCS / APC / PM / SOS, other ESC x	Drop	Terminal-specific side effects.
Remaining C0 (including \r), DEL, C1	Drop	\r overwrite is the classic log-spoofing trick.

Conceal detection operates on standalone parameters: an SGR sequence containing a standalone 8 parameter is dropped whole (subject to the strip/visualize mode, like any other dropped sequence). Parameters consumed by the extended color introducers 38, 48, and 58 (e.g. 38;5;8, 48;2;…;8, and their colon-separated variants) are color payload, never conceal.

A dropped sequence is removed in strip mode or replaced by a single visible ␛ (U+241B) marker in visualize mode. Strip is the default: pasted logs render as clean text. Strip mode preserves printable text outside disallowed control sequences; payload bytes inside dropped sequences (an OSC title's text, OSC 52's clipboard data) are not rendered — use visualize to mark their presence, or off to inspect raw terminal behavior.

[style]
# How control sequences in untrusted content are rendered.
# strip     - remove disallowed sequences (default)
# visualize - replace disallowed sequences with a visible ␛ marker
# off       - disable content sanitization for pretty terminal rendering.
#             OSC embedding is still escaped, and non-pretty output still
#             strips ANSI.
sanitize = "strip"

The knob governs the render-pipeline sanitizer wherever it is wired — live streaming and history re-rendering alike. OSC embedding hardening (below) and the non-pretty ANSI stripping are independent of it.

The sanitizer

A streaming filter in jp_term (working name sanitize::Sanitizer), built on the same vte::Parser foundation as the existing jp_printer::ansi::AnsiStripper. The parser state persists across chunks, so a sequence split over two stream events is still recognized — the same property AnsiStripper already needs for non-pretty output. The difference is policy: AnsiStripper drops everything; Sanitizer applies the allowlist above.

The API is a stateful chunk transformer (fn push(&mut self, chunk: &str) -> String plus a finish() that settles any dangling partial sequence). Instances are scoped per content kind per turn: reasoning and message chunks interleave within a turn (ChatRenderer::flush_on_transition), and a shared instance would join a partial sequence from one kind with bytes from the other. finish() runs at kind transitions and turn boundaries, so a dangling introducer never spans kinds.

On naming: sanitize already appears in JP with two other meanings — storage sanitization (RFD 052's Workspace::sanitize / SanitizeReport) and conversation-stream repair (ConversationStream::sanitize). This RFD adds a third: display sanitization, scoped to jp_term and the render pipeline. The implementation updates the ubiquitous-language documentation to define all three.

Placement

Sanitization happens where content enters the render pipeline, before markdown parsing:

untrusted text ──▶ Sanitizer ──▶ jp_md Buffer ──▶ Formatter ──▶ Printer
                                    (chrome styling added here, trusted)

It cannot happen at the printer: by that point trusted jp_md styling and untrusted content bytes are interleaved and indistinguishable. Allowed SGR bytes still flow into jp_md's parser and can sit mid-token (inside emphasis or fence markers); that interaction is unchanged from today.

Concretely:

1. ChatRenderer::render_request — the echo of editor-composed and replayed user messages (the triggering incident).
2. ChatRenderer::render_content / render_reasoning — streamed LLM output, with one Sanitizer per content kind to handle chunk-split sequences (see above).
3. Tool-result rendering (jp_cli::render::tool) — audit for text paths that bypass jp_md and wrap them.
4. History re-rendering (jp conversation print/show) — covered where it reuses the chat renderer; audit for direct prints.
5. Table and list rendering of conversation-derived strings — jp conversation ls prints LLM-generated titles into a table with its own display-width math; embedded control bytes corrupt both the cells and the width computation.

OSC embedding hardening

Independent of the configurable sanitizer, jp_term::osc escapes the dynamic strings it splices into OSC sequences by removing all control characters — C0 (including BEL and ESC), DEL, and C1 code points — covering both the BEL- and ST-terminated forms. The module has exactly two embedding positions today:

• set_title — the conversation title (LLM-generated text) inside OSC 2.
• hyperlink — the URI inside OSC 8. Call sites splice model-influenceable strings into this position: jp_cli::render::tool builds file:// / copy:// URIs from tool-created paths, and jp conversation ls builds jp:// URIs from IDs. Only the URI is escaped; the link text argument sits between the OSC open/close sequences in ordinary display space, legitimately carries SGR styling, and is covered by the general sanitizer instead.

Sanitization applies to content strings before they are spliced into chrome, never to already-assembled chrome. Raw OSC 8 arriving in content is dropped by the sanitizer; JP-authored OSC 8 built via jp_term::osc::hyperlink is trusted chrome after URI escaping.

This escaping is unconditional — there is no legitimate title or URI containing control characters — and ships even when sanitize = "off".

What does not change

• Stored data and LLM input. Conversations keep the verbatim bytes, and the model receives them unmodified. Sanitization is a display concern; the debugging session that motivated this RFD depended on the model seeing raw escape bytes in a pasted log, and that must keep working.
• Non-pretty output. The out/err sinks already strip all ANSI via AnsiStripper for non-pretty formats; that behavior stays.
• Chrome. JP's own styling, widgets, and the reedline/inquire prompts are untouched.

Drawbacks

• A tool or user who deliberately emits cursor-control art loses it (until they set sanitize = "off").
• Allowed SGR from tool output can clash with jp_md's styling state: a SGR 0 reset inside a code block resets the block's background fill until the formatter's next own write. This exists today; sanitization neither fixes nor worsens it.
• A vte parse per content byte on the streaming path — negligible next to network latency, but nonzero.
• Dropping \r turns tool progress redraws (\r-overwritten lines, common in build tools) into concatenated text in rendered tool results. CRLF line endings are unaffected, since \n survives.
• Allowing SGR keeps one residual hiding trick: matching foreground to background color. Blocking that requires tracking color state against the theme, which is not worth the complexity now (see Risks).

Alternatives

• Strip all escape sequences from content. Simplest and safest, but breaks legitimate colored tool output — an explicit requirement.
• Sanitize at the printer sink. Rejected: trusted chrome and untrusted content are indistinguishable there.
• Sanitize at ingestion (storage). Rejected: corrupts data, blinds the LLM to bytes the user asked about, and cannot be revisited later (a policy change would not restore stripped bytes).
• Caret-notation everything (^[[48;5;236m). Honest but extremely noisy for the common pasted-log case; offered in spirit via visualize, which marks without expanding.

Non-Goals

• Sanitizing content sent to the LLM or stored in conversations.
• Protecting the serve-web HTML view — it needs HTML-escaping, a different mechanism with its own existing handling.
• Defending against a hostile terminal emulator itself.
• Redesigning styling; the sanitizer is formatter-agnostic and slots in front of whatever formatter the render pipeline uses, today or after any future styling redesign.
• Capability adaptation of styling (color downgrading, NO_COLOR, non-TTY stripping); that is the terminal sink's job, downstream of rendering. The seam: this RFD neutralizes untrusted content where it enters the render pipeline; capability adaptation applies to already-trusted styling on the way out. The untrusted-content SGR allowlist is owned here, not at the sink, so the two policies cannot drift apart.

Risks and Open Questions

• Is strip the right default? visualize makes tampering attempts loud; strip is cleaner for the common accidental case. The config knob keeps this a one-line decision to revisit.
• OSC 8 hyperlinks. Dropped for now (link text can misrepresent the target). Could be allowlisted later with a scheme filter.
• SGR sub-policy. Conceal is dropped; blink and reverse-video pass. If fg==bg hiding shows up in practice, tighten to a parameter allowlist.
• Where exactly tool results bypass jp_md needs an implementation-time audit; the design assumes wrapping is mechanical.
• Partial sequence at stream end. finish() must decide between dropping and visualizing a dangling introducer; proposal: treat as dropped sequence.

Implementation Plan

1. jp_term::sanitize — the vte-based allowlist filter with unit tests (sequence classes, chunk-split sequences, finish()). Independent, no behavior change until wired.
2. OSC embedding hardening in jp_term::osc. Two-line change plus tests; independent and immediate.
3. Config knob style.sanitize in jp_config (default strip).
4. Wire the chat paths: render_request, render_content, render_reasoning; snapshot tests with escape-laden fixtures. For truncated reasoning display, sanitize before applying the visible-character budget, so control sequences neither consume the truncation limit nor get split by the truncator.
5. Audit and wire tool-result, history, and table/list rendering (jp conversation ls titles). In jp_cli::render::tool, write_chrome is an output helper, not a trust marker: it emits both JP-authored headers and relayed tool-result text. Sanitize the untrusted input (inner_content, custom-formatter output) before it is formatted — code-block highlighting adds trusted styling to those bytes ahead of the write — and do not sanitize JP-authored headers, separators, temp lines, or assembled jp_term::osc::hyperlink chrome.
6. Docs: docs/configuration.md entry; note in the security section of the README docs; ubiquitous-language entry disambiguating display sanitization from storage sanitization (RFD 052) and stream repair.

Steps 1–2 are mergeable independently; 3–5 land together behind the default.

References

• RFD 048: Four-Channel Output Model — the channel taxonomy this RFD's trust classes build on.
• RFD 052: Workspace Data Store Sanitization — the other sanitize in JP; storage-level, unrelated to display sanitization.
• jp_printer::ansi::AnsiStripper — existing vte-based full strip for non-pretty output; the sanitizer generalizes its approach.
• Terminal escape injection — survey of the attack class, including OSC 52 clipboard writes.